Behavioural Approaches to Muslim Politics: The State of the Art


political behaviour
political attitudes
political development

How to Cite

Mujani, S. (2022). Behavioural Approaches to Muslim Politics: The State of the Art. Muslim Politics Review, 1(1), 41-57.


The behavioural approach to Muslim politics in academic literature is a recent development. The approach emerged only in the early twenty-first century, largely as most Muslim-majority nations have been autocracies constraining the freedom of speech required to study political attitudes and behaviour. Many behaviourally driven studies have examined dimensions of Islam as predictors of political attitudes and behaviorr. These include religious affiliation, religiosity, and religious political orientation. While democracy is rare in Muslim majority nations, at the individual level, Muslim religious affiliation and religiosity only partially predict political attitudes and behaviour. Taking an expansive measure of Islamism or Islamic ideology helps us understand this, as it potentially predicts the absence of liberal democracy in Muslim countries. To do this successfully, however, more realistic external validity is required. Scholars still often define and measure Islamism differently, therefore a more standardised measure is required for comparative study.


Almond, Gabriel A., and Sydney Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Boston: Little, Brown.

Beatty, Andrew. 1999. Varieties of Javanese Religion: An Anthropological Account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Campbell, Angus, Phillip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.

Eickelman, Dale F., and James Piscatori. 2004. Muslim Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Fish, M. Steven. 2011. Are Muslims Distinctive? A Look at the Evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fossati, Diego. 2022. Unity through Divison. Political Islam, Representation, and Democracy in Indonesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gaffar, Afan. 1992. Javanese Voters: A Case Study of Elections under a Hegemonic Party System. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.

Harik, Iliya. 1988. "Some Political and Cultural Considerations Bearing on Survey Research in the Arab World." In The Evaluation and Application of Survey Research in the Arab World. Mark Tessler, Monte Palmer, Tawfic E. Farah, and Barbara Ibrahim, eds. New York: Routledge.

Hefner, Robert W. 1985. Hindu Javanese: Tengger Tradition and Islam. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Jackson, Karl D. 1980. Traditional Authority, Islam, and Rebellion: A Study of Indonesian Political Behavior. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Mallarangeng, Andi Alfian. 1997. Contextual Analysis of Indonesian Electoral Behavior. PhD Dissertation, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL.

Mujani, Saiful. 2003. Religious Democrats: Democratic Culture and Muslim Political Participation in Post-Suharto Indonesia. PhD Dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus OH.

Mujani, Saiful, R. William Liddle, and Kuskridho Ambardi. 2018. Voting Behavior in Indonesia since Democratization. Critical Democrats. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Norris, Pippa, and Ronald Inglehart. 2004. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pepinsky, Thomas B., R. William Liddle, and Saiful Mujani. 2018. Piety and Public Opinion. Understanding Indonesian Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tessler, Mark, Monte Palmer, Tawfic E. Farah, and Barbara Ibrahim. 1988. The Evaluation and Application of Survey Research in the Arab World. New York: Routledge.

Woodward, Mark R. 1989. Islam in Java: Normative Piety and Mysticism in the Sultanate of Yogyakarta. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Download data is not yet available.