Abstract
Smartphones now occupy a central place in the social lives of university students, yet their consequences for academic engagement and interpersonal connection are not always straightforward. This study examined the prevalence of phubbing, defined as the use of a smartphone during face-to-face interaction, and its associations with academic engagement and social connectedness among 381 undergraduates at the Federal University of Kashere, Nigeria. A correlational survey design was employed, with participants selected through stratified random sampling. Data were collected using validated measures of phubbing, academic engagement and social connectedness. Descriptive statistics and simple linear regression were employed for data analysis. The findings revealed that phubbing was moderately prevalent among undergraduate students. Furthermore, phubbing significantly predicted lower levels of academic engagement and social connectedness, indicating that increased engagement in phubbing behavior is associated with reduced involvement in academic activities and weaker interpersonal connections within the university environment. These findings extend the growing body of evidence on the adverse consequences of phubbing in a Nigerian higher education context and carry implications for digital literacy policy and student support services.References
Ang, C.S., Teo, K.M., Ong, Y.L., & Siak, S.L. (2019). Investigation of a preliminary mixed method of phubbing and social connectedness in adolescents. Addiction & Health, 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.22122/ahj.v11i1.539
Bajwa, R. S., Abdullah, H., Zaremohzzabieh, Z., Wan Jaafar, W. M., & Abu Samah, A. (2023). Smartphone addiction and phubbing behavior among university students: A moderated mediation model by fear of missing out, social comparison, and loneliness. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1072551. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1072551
Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). The effects of phubbing on social interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(6), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12506
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
DataReportal. (2023). Digital 2023: Global overview report. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-global-overview-report
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (10th ed.). Pearson.
International Telecommunication Union. (2023). Facts and figures 2023: Internet use. https://www.itu.int/itu-d/reports/statistics/2023/10/10/ff23-internet-use/
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
Kobicheva, A., Tokareva, E., & Baranova, T. (2025). How does students’ level of phubbing relate to academic engagement and performance variables? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 40, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-024-00905-7
Lee, R. M., Draper, M., & Lee, S. (2001). Social connectedness, dysfunctional interpersonal behaviors, and psychological distress. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(3), 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.48.3.310
Nazir, T. (2017). Attitude and emotional response among university students of Ankara towards phubbing. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Education Research, 6(1), 143–152.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Nwachukwu, C., & Onyenankeya, K. (2017). Use of smartphones among college students in Nigeria: Revelations and reflections. Journal of Communication, 8(2), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/0976691X.2017.1396007
Pesch, A., Todaro, R., Piper, D., Evans, N. S., Pasek, J., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2024). A bird’s-eye view of phubbing: How adult observations of phone use impact judgments, epistemic trust, and interpersonal trust. Mobile Media & Communication, 12(3), 536–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579241246726
Schaufeli, W. B., Martínez, I. M., Pinto, A. M., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033005003
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. Wiley.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Thornton, B., Faires, A., Robbins, M., & Rollins, E. (2014). The mere presence of a cell phone may be distracting: Implications for attention and task performance. Social Psychology, 45(6), 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000216
Tufan, C., Köksal, K., & Griffiths, M. D. (2025). The impact of smartphone addiction, phubbing, and fear of missing out on social co-operation and life satisfaction among university students. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-025-01477-3
Yam, F. C., Demir, Y., & Manap, A. (2025). Investigating phubbing behaviors among university students: A latent profile analysis study. BMC Psychology, 13, Article 886. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03212-y

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Lawan Bappah, Umaru Hyelhara Mshelia, Musa Hauwa Babaji
