How to Cite
Abstract
This article examines how autonomy and institutional reform shape global competitiveness in Indonesian Islamic higher education. It asks how Islamic higher education institutions understand global competitiveness, how governance arrangements shape institutional reform, and what challenges emerge when autonomy, religious identity and international academic expectations intersect. Drawing on a qualitative comparative case study of three Islamic higher education institutions, this article examines how different governance arrangements, i.e. semi-autonomous public university (BLU), legal-entity public university (PTN-BH), and Muhammadiyah-affiliated private university, shape institutional strategies and responses to global competitiveness. The findings show that global competitiveness is not understood through a single model. In the semi-autonomous public university, competitiveness is framed as gradual institutional upgrading; in the legal-entity public university, it is framed as international positioning from inception; and in the Muhammadiyah-affiliated private university, it is framed as substantive international engagement rooted in social and religious mission. The article further shows that autonomy creates organizational space for reform, but does not automatically produce research capacity, international visibility, or academic excellence. Semi-autonomous governance provides limited flexibility under strong state supervision; legal-entity governance expands discretion while shifting sustainability risks to the university; and Muhammadiyah-affiliated private governance enables agility while intensifying dependence on tuition, foundation authority and market positioning. The article argues that governance transformation in Islamic higher education involves negotiated adaptation rather than convergence toward a single global model.References
Agasisti, T., & Shibanova, E. (2022). Actual autonomy, efficiency and performance of universities: Insights from the Russian case. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1903496
Altbach, P. G., & Salmi, J. (2011). The road to academic excellence. World Bank.
Amiruddin, A. (2017). Dinamika lembaga pendidikan tinggi Islam di Indonesia. MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 41(1), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v41i1.314
Biswan, A., & Waluyo, B. (2014). Costing system for educational service: Case study in the College of State Accountancy as public service agency. Jurnal Infoartha, 3, 100–105.
Bunyamin, B., & Alamsyah, A. (2016). Manajemen mutu perguruan tinggi agama Islam swasta. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 28(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v28i2.544
Christensen, T., Lie, A., & Lægreid, P. (2008). Beyond New Public Management: Agencification and regulatory reform in Norway. Financial Accountability & Management, 24(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2008.00441.x
Dan, S. (2014). The effects of agency reform in Europe: A review of the evidence. Public Policy and Administration, 29(3), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076713517412
de Boer, H. F., Enders, J., & Schimank, U. (2007). On the way towards New Public Management? The governance of university systems in England, the Netherlands, Austria and Germany. In D. Jansen (Ed.), New forms of governance in research organizations: Disciplinary approaches, interfaces and integration (pp. 137–152). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5831-8_5
Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2009). Political leadership and bureaucratic autonomy: Effects of agencification. Governance, 22(4), 673–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01458.x
Hazelkorn, E. (2008). Learning to live with league tables and ranking: The experience of institutional leaders. Higher Education Policy, 21(2), 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2008.1
Hazelkorn, E. (2015). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education. Palgrave Macmillan.
Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007
Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.
Irham, I. (2025). Policies and patterns of integration of science and religion in Indonesian Islamic higher education. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01378-9
Juhaidi, A. (2024). University choice factors: A case of two types of higher education in the third-largest island in the world. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2367731
Kallio, T. J., Kallio, K.-M., Huusko, M., Pyykkö, R., & Kivistö, J. (2022). Balancing between accountability and autonomy: The impact and relevance of public steering mechanisms within higher education. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 34(6), 46–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-10-2020-0177
Khoir, T., Ma’arif, S., Elizabeth, M. Z., & Permata, K. I. (2025). The narrowing spaces for Islamic knowledge at Islamic higher education in Indonesia: Opportunity and challenge. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01370-3
Khoiriyati, H., Setiawan, B., & Mulyadi, M. (2024). The concept of transforming the leadership of Islamic universities in Indonesia towards a world-class university. International Journal of Management and Education, 7(2), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.24036/ijmurhica.v7i2.211
Kosim, M., Muqoddam, F., Mubarok, F., & Laila, N. Q. (2023). The dynamics of Islamic education policies in Indonesia. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172930
Krücken, G., & Meier, F. (2006). Turning the university into an organizational actor. In G. S. Drori, J. W. Meyer, & H. Hwang (Eds.), Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change (pp. 241–257). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199284535.003.0011
Laking, R. (2002). Distributed public governance: Principles for control and accountability of delegated and devolved bodies, in OECD, Distributed public governance: Agencies, authorities and other autonomous bodies, OECD.
Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-7649-x
Meuleman, J. (2002). Institut Agama Islam Negeri at a crossroads. In R. Hefner (Ed.), Islamic Education in Southeast Asia (pp. 284–306). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203988862-18
Mok, K. H. (2007). Questing for internationalization of universities in Asia: Critical reflections. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 433–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306291945
Nugraha, M. S., Sahroni, D., & Latifah, A. (2016). Private Islamic higher education in ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) era. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 2(3), 393–410. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v2i3.853
Nurdin, I. (2021). Modernization of Islamic higher education in Indonesia at a glance: Barriers and opportunities. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(3), 288–296. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i3.2490
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector, A Plum Book.
Overman, S., & van Thiel, S. (2016). Agencification and public sector performance: A systematic comparison in 20 countries. Public Management Review, 18(4), 611–635.
Overman, S., van Thiel, S., & Lafarge, F. (2014). Resisting governmental control: How semi-autonomous agencies use strategic resources to challenge state coordination. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80(1), 172–192.
Pollitt, C., Bathgate, K., Caulfield, J., Smullen, A., & Talbot, C. (2001). Agency fever? Analysis of an international policy fashion. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 3(3), 271–290.
Pollitt, C., & Talbot, C. (2004). Unbundled government: A critical analysis of the global trend to agencies, quangos and contractualisation, Routledge.
Republic of Indonesia. (2005). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 23 Tahun 2005 tentang Pengelolaan Keuangan Badan Layanan Umum (Government Regulation Number 23 of 2005 on Financial Management of Public Service Agencies).
Republic of Indonesia. (2012a). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 74 Tahun 2012 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 23 Tahun 2005 tentang Pengelolaan Keuangan Badan Layanan Umum (Government Regulation Number 74 of 2012 on Amendment to Government Regulation Number 23 of 2005 on Financial Management of Public Service Agencies).
Republic of Indonesia. (2012b). Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi (Law Number 12 of 2012 on Higher Education).
Republic of Indonesia. (2014). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 4 Tahun 2014 tentang Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Tinggi dan Pengelolaan Perguruan Tinggi (Government Regulation Number 4 of 2014 on Implementation of Higher Education and Management of Higher Education Institutions).
Republic of Indonesia. (2015). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 26 Tahun 2015 tentang Bentuk dan Mekanisme Pendanaan Perguruan Tinggi Negeri Badan Hukum (Government Regulation Number 26 of 2015 on Forms and Mechanisms of Funding for State Universities with Legal-Entity Status).
Republic of Indonesia. (2016). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 57 Tahun 2016 tentang Pendirian Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia (Presidential Regulation Number 57 of 2016 on Establishment of Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia).
Republic of Indonesia. (2019a). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 23 Tahun 2019 tentang Statuta Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia (Government Regulation Number 23 of 2019 on Statute of Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia).
Republic of Indonesia. (2019b). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 46 Tahun 2019 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi Keagamaan (Government Regulation Number 46 of 2019 on Religious Higher Education).
Republic of Indonesia. (2020). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 8 Tahun 2020 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 26 Tahun 2015 tentang Bentuk dan Mekanisme Pendanaan Perguruan Tinggi Negeri Badan Hukum (Government Regulation Number 8 of 2020 on Amendment to Government Regulation Number 26 of 2015 on Forms and Mechanisms of Funding for State Universities with Legal-Entity Status).
Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research, in A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data, (pp. 173–194), Taylor & Francis.
Sahrodi, J., & Karim, A. (2025). Leader power of Islamic higher education institutions in improving the performance of human resources management. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2442818
Sibawaihi, S., Suyatno, S., Suyadi, S., & Fernandes, V. (2024). Transforming Islamic higher education institutions in Indonesia from “institutes/colleges” into “universities”: Globalization or glocalization? Management in Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/08920206241268506
Srivastava, A., & Thomson, S. B. (2009). Framework analysis: A qualitative methodology for applied policy research. JOAAG, 4(2), 72–79.
Suyadi, S., Nuryana, Z., Sutrisno, S., & Baidi, B. (2022). Academic reform and sustainability of Islamic higher education in Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Development, 89, 102534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102534
Thynne, I. (2003). Making sense of organizations in public management: A back-to-basics approach. Public Organization Review, 332, 317–332.
Ulinuha, M. (2022). Implementation of the concept of religious moderation in Private Islamic Higher Education (PIHE). Penamas, 35(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.31330/penamas.v35i1.552
Usman, M., & Rokhimawan, A. (2024). Unraveling the strategic roadmap to achieve world-class status in Indonesia's Islamic universities: A comparative study. Journal of Education and Social Research, 14(4), 430–442. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2024-0113
Usman, U., & Hamdan, H. (2024). Strategic policy towards a world-class university: An Indonesian Islamic university experience. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(4), 9208–9218. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i4.1911
Verhoest, K., van Thiel, S., Bouckaert, G., & Lægreid, P. (Eds.). (2010). Government agencies: Practices and lessons from 30 countries. Palgrave Macmillan.
Wiarda, H. J. (2007). Comparative politics: Approaches and issues. Rowman & Littlefield.
Yesilkagit, K., & van Thiel, S. (2008). Political influence and bureaucratic autonomy. Public Organization Review, 8(2), 137–153.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Budi Waluyo