How to Cite
Abstract
This study aimed to uncover how elementary school students and their teacher make meaning as they participate in text-based classroom discussion at an American Islamic school. One English language art teacher and 20sixth grade students participated in this study. We employed a case study design with classroom observation, field notes and documentation as tools for data collection. The gathered data were analyzed qualitatively. We found that the classroom talks in discussing textual information followed the traditional I-R-E (Initiate-Respond-Evaluate) pattern in which the teacher held control over turn-taking opportunities and interpretive authority. The students’ participations in this discourse were restricted to remembering facts, rules and procedures found in the text in which their responses were limited and brief. In contrast, the classroom talks about extratextual information as well as about Islamic knowledge and values were more dialogic in which the conversational flow was not directed by the teacher. The students’ responses were longer with elaborated explanation or reasoning to support their position. Their Islamic cultural backgrounds and practices also enabled them to extend the discussion and make better sense of the text. These findings indicate that teachers’ didactic strategy in conducting text-based classroom discussion shapes whether students would have meaningful interaction or not. We subscribe to the view that meaning of text and knowledge construction are not solely derived from the text or defined by one person. Instead, they can be co-constructed in dialogic discussion that challenges various voices, tensions and conflicts between members of the class.References
Al Lily, A. E. (2011). On line and under veil: Technology-facilitated communication and Saudi female experience within academia. Technology in Society, 33(1–2), 119–127.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). The Bildungsroman and its significance in the history of realism. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, 10, 21.
Barone, T., & Eisner, E. W. (2011). Arts based research. Sage.
Boardman, A. G., Boelé, A. L., & Klingner, J. K. (2018). Strategy instruction shifts teacher and student interactions during text‐based discussions. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(2), 175–195.
Cardinale, K. (1999). Bilingual education for limited English proficiency students: Local interests and resource availability as determinants of pedagogical practice. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 12(1), 37–57.
Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Heinemann.
Chao, X., & Mantero, M. (2014). Church-based ESL adult programs: Social mediators for empowering “Family Literacy Ecology of Communities”. Journal of Literacy Research, 46(1), 90–114.
Curtis, C. (1999). Bud not Buddy. Delacorte.
de Heer, N., Due, C., Riggs, D. W., & Augoustinos, M. (2016). “It will be hard because I will have to learn lots of English”: Experiences of education for children newly arrived in Australia. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(3), 297–319.
de Oliveira, L. C., & Shoffner, M. (2009). Addressing the needs of English language learners in an English education methods course. English Education, 42(1), 91–111.
Drucker, M. J. (2003). What reading teachers should know about ESL learners. The Reading Teacher, 57(1), 22–29.
Garas-York, K., & Almasi, J. F. (2017). Constructing meaning through discussion. Handbook of research on reading comprehension, 2, 500–525.
García-Sánchez, F., Sánchez, R. T., & Isla, J. G. (2014, October). Semiotic and technological analysis of photography: A visual literacy study in the educative area. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 709–713).
Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano‐López, P., Alvarez, H. H., & Chiu, M. M. (1999). Building a culture of collaboration through hybrid language practices. Theory Into Practice, 38(2), 87–93.
Hammersley, M. (2013). The myth of research-based policy and practice. Sage.
Heath, S. B. (2010). Family literacy or community learning? Some critical questions on perspective. Bringing Literacy Home, 15–41.
Hesse, K. (1997). Out of the dust. Scholastic.
Hite, C. E., & Evans, L. S. (2006). Mainstream first-grade teachers’ understanding of strategies for accommodating the needs of English language learners. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(2), 89–110.
Islam, C., & Park, M. H. (2015). Preparing teachers to promote culturally relevant teaching: Helping English language learners in the classroom. Multicultural Education, 23(1), 38–44.
Kganetso, L. M. (2017). Creating and using culturally sustaining informational texts. The Reading Teacher, 70(4), 445–455.
Kong, A., & Pearson, P. D. (2003). The road to participation: The construction of a literacy practice in a learning community of linguistically diverse learners. Research in the Teaching of English, 85–124.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.
Lantolf, J. P. (2011). The sociocultural approach to second language acquisition: Sociocultural theory, second language acquisition, and artificial L2 development. In Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 24–47). Routledge.
Larson, J. (1995). Talk matters: The role of pivot in the distribution of literacy knowledge among novice writers. Linguistics and Education, 7(4), 277–302.
Louie, B., & Sierschynski, J. (2015). Enhancing English learners’ language development using wordless picture books. The Reading Teacher, 69(1), 103–111.
Lucas, T., & Villegas, A. M. (2013). Preparing linguistically responsive teachers: Laying the foundation in preservice teacher education. Theory Into Practice, 52(2), 98–109.
Lucas, T., Villegas, A. M., & Freedson-Gonzalez, M. (2008). Linguistically responsive teacher education: Preparing classroom teachers to teach English language learners. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 361–373.
Lytra, V., Gregory, E., & Ilankuberan, A. (2016). Bridging faith, languages and learning in London: A faith teacher reflects upon pedagogy in religious instruction classes. Language and Education, 30(6), 554–569.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2016). Designing qualitative research. Sage publications.
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Moore, L. C. (2008). Language socialization and second/foreign language and multilingual education in non-Western settings. Encyclopaedia of Language and Education, 8, 175–185.
Murphy, S. L. (2015). How do we teach them to read if they can’t pay attention? Change in literacy teaching practice through collaborative learning. Language and Literacy, 17(1), 83-105.
Nystrand, M. (2006). Research on the role of classroom discourse as it affects reading comprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 392–412.
Parlindungan, F. (2017). Exploring literacy practices in a second language. TEFLIN Journal, 28(1), 115–132.
Parlindungan, F., & Rodgers, A. (2022). Texts used in the English language arts classroom of an American Islamic school. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(3), 100–1018.
Parlindungan, F., Rifai, I., & Safriani, A. (2018). The representation of Indonesian cultural diversity in middle school English textbooks. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 289–302.
Peele‐Eady, T. B. (2011). Constructing membership identity through language and social interaction: The case of African American children at Faith Missionary Baptist Church. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 42(1), 54–75.
Reynolds, T. (2016). Striving for discussion: An analysis of a teacher educator’s comments in whole-class conversation. Studying Teacher Education, 12(2), 205–221.
Reznitskaya, A., & Wilkinson, I. A. (2017). Truth matters: Teaching young students to search for the most reasonable answer. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(4), 33–38.
Rifai, I., Parlindungan, F., & Nuthihar, R. (2022). Talk in dramatic interactions: An examination of three discourse-based studies in literacy classes. Language Discourse & Society, 10(2), 20.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, and the poem: The transactional theory of the literature work. Southern Illinois University Press.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (2013). The transactional theory of reading and writing. In D. E. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 923–956). International Reading Association.
Sefarini, F. (2013). Reading the visual: An introduction to teaching multimodal literacy. Teachers College Press.
Sharma, S. A., & Christ, T. (2017). Five steps toward successful culturally relevant text selection and integration. The Reading Teacher, 71(3), 295–307.
Short, K. G., & Cueto, D. W. (2023). Essentials of children’s literature. Pearson.
Soter, A. O., Wilkinson, I. A., Murphy, P. K., Rudge, L., Reninger, K., & Edwards, M. (2008). What the discourse tells us: Talk and indicators of high-level comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(6), 372–391.
Toppel, K. (2015). Enhancing core reading programs with culturally responsive practices. The Reading Teacher, 68(7), 552–559.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the Development of Children, 23(3), 34–41.
Webb, S. (2009). The effects of receptive and productive learning of word pairs on vocabulary knowledge. RELC journal, 40(3), 360–376.
Wilkinson, I. A., & Nelson, K. (2013). Role of discussion in reading comprehension. International Guide to Student Achievement, 299–302.
Wiseman, A. M. (2009). “When you do your best, there’s someone to encourage you”: Adolescents’ views of family literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(2), 132–142.
Wood, D. (1998). How children think and learn. John Wiley & Sons.
Zine, J. (2008). Canadian Islamic schools: Unravelling the politics of faith, gender, knowledge, and identity. University of Toronto Press.
Zwiers, J., & Crawford, M. (2009). How to start academic conversations. Educational Leadership, 66(7), 70–73.