ESG on Stability and Bank Performance: The Moderating Role of Diversity and Inclusion in OIC Countries

Abstract

This study analyses the impact of environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance on the stability and performance of Islamic banks, considering the moderating role of diversity and inclusion. Using panel data from 60 Islamic banks in 11 Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) countries during the period 2014-2023, the research finds that ESG performance positively affects the stability and performance of Islamic banks, confirming the role of sustainability in enhancing the financial resilience of the Islamic banking sector. However, this study also finds that diversity and inclusion weakens the positive impact of ESG performance on the stability and performance of Islamic banks. Additional analysis shows that these results are consistent only in the environmental and social pillars. These findings highlight the importance of managing diversity and inclusion to enhance ESG implementation in Islamic banks. Poorly managed diversity and inclusion efforts may weaken ESG effectiveness, hindering performance and stability. For stakeholders, including investors and regulators, fostering inclusion is essential to support sustainability and long-term stability.
https://doi.org/10.56529/mber.v4i2.530
PDF

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

MBER have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.

In developing strategy and setting priorities, MBER recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.

Creative Commons License

MBER is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

You are free to:

  • Adapt remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  • The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.