Abstract
This article examines the influence of polarity in religious understanding on attachment to halal certification in Indonesia. In 2024, there were 3,237,167 products that have been certified halal, with 58.5% being self-declared as halal and the remaining 41.5% being regular halal certificates. This number has more than tripled since 2019, when there were just 963,411 halal-certified products. The high increase in the number of halal-certified products is directly proportional to the high halal awareness of Indonesian Muslims. Previous studies have not explicitly addressed the concept of halal as understood by the Indonesian Muslim community, which possesses a diverse range of religious interpretations. This article reveals the typology of Indonesian Muslim religious understanding and its influence on attachment to halal certification. This research used quantitative methods by distributing questionnaires to Indonesian Muslim respondents with conservative, moderate, and progressive religious categorizations. Respondents in this study were aged 18-60 years, and included both men and women. Data were analyzed using the ANOVA technique using SPSS 29.0.1. The results show a significant value (0.008), indicating a difference in attachment to halal certification between conservative, moderate, and progressive groups, with the highest attachment average amongst conservative Muslims (33.46).Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
MBER have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, MBER recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
MBER is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
You are free to:
- Share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.