Two Different Approaches of Estimating Production Factor Demand: Evidence from Indonesian Large and Medium Enterprises

Abstract

This study measures the elasticity of production factors of manufacturing companies in Indonesia by applying demand model for production inputs. Using survey data of large and medium-sized companies in Indonesia from 1995-2015, this study calculates the elasticity of demand for factors of production through two approaches: first, the transcendental logarithm equations applying unrestricted, homotheticity, and adjustment cost model, and second, a system of equations. We use the variation in the group of industries as a proxy for the market price of inputs. The results show that there is heterogeneity in terms of the magnitude and nature of the cross-price elasticity between production inputs for both complementary and substitute inputs. Meanwhile, the own price elasticity is negative for all production inputs and there are positive effect adjustment costs that must be borne by firms in expanding production inputs.
https://doi.org/10.56529/mber.v4i1.415
PDF

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

MBER have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.

In developing strategy and setting priorities, MBER recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.

Creative Commons License

MBER is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

You are free to:

  • Adapt remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  • The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.