Abstract
Carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions pose a significant climate threat, impacting all aspects of human activity and necessitating global collaboration to protect both human and nonhuman species. Transitioning from fossil fuels to renewable energy and enhancing energy efficiency are widely regarded as the most effective strategies for reducing emissions and mitigating global warming. Against this backdrop, we examine CO₂ emissions convergence among 50 Organization of Islamic Countries (OIC) member states, considering the role of economic growth, renewable energy use, and energy intensity. Our analysis employs stochastic, club, and beta convergence methods, alongside system generalized method of moments (GMM) estimation. Four key findings emerge from this analysis. First, accounting for country heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence, we confirm stochastic convergence in CO₂ emissions among OIC members. Second, there is evidence of club convergence, where emissions cluster into distinct groups. Third, while renewable energy consumption negatively affects emissions pathway, energy intensity positively and directly affects CO₂ emissions’ growth. However, fourth, economic growth increases carbon emissions. These findings have significant policy implications. If emissions do not converge, allocating emission rights through carbon trading could lead to substantial international wealth transfers, influencing global carbon policy. Additionally, countries with similar convergence patterns could adopt common climate policies. At the same time, all nations should prioritize increasing the share of renewable energy in their energy mix to achieve sustainable emission reductions.References
Acaravci, A., & Erdogan, S. (2016). The convergence behavior of CO2 emissions in seven regions under multiple structural breaks. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 6(3), 575–580.
Ahmed, K., & Long, W. (2013). An empirical analysis of CO2 emission in Pakistan using EKC hypothesis. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 12(2), 188–200. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JITLP-10-2012-0015/full/html
Akram, V., Rath, B. N., & Sahoo, P. K. (2020). Stochastic conditional convergence in per capita energy consumption in India. Economic Analysis and Policy, 65, 224–240.
Akyüz, M. K. (2025). Global warming potential and enviroeconomic impact of commercial flights: A pre- to post-COVID-19 analysis. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 47(1), 624–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2024.2443036
Aldy, J. E. (2006). Per capita carbon dioxide emissions: Convergence or divergence? Environmental and Resource Economics, 33(4), 533–555.
Aldy, J. E., & Armitage, S. C. (2022). The Welfare Implications of Carbon Price Certainty (Working Paper No. 30043). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w30043
Alexiadis, S. (2012). Convergence clubs and spatial externalities: Models and applications of regional convergence in Europe. Springer Science & Business Media.
Ang, B. W. (2004). Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: Which is the preferred method? Energy Policy, 32(9), 1131–1139. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421503000764
Ashraf, S., P, J., & Umar, Z. (2022). The asymmetric relationship between foreign direct investment, oil prices and carbon emissions: Evidence from Gulf Cooperative Council economies. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 2080316. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2080316
Avis, W. (2021). Role of faith and belief in environmental engagement and action in MENA region.
Bai, C., Mao, Y., Gong, Y., & Feng, C. (2019). Club convergence and factors of per capita transportation carbon emissions in China. Sustainability, 11(2), 539.
Barak, D., Kocoglu, M., Jahanger, A., & Tan, M. (2024). Testing the EKC hypothesis for ecological and carbon intensity of well-being: The role of forest extent. Science of the Total Environment, 945, 173794. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004896972403941X
Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). Technological Diffusion, Convergence, and Growth (Working Paper No. 5151). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w5151
Barro, R. J., Sala-i-Martin, X., Blanchard, O. J., & Hall, R. E. (1991). Convergence across states and regions. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 107–182.
Berkhout, F., & Hertin, J. (2001). Impacts of information and communication technologies on environmental sustainability: Speculations and evidence. Report to the OECD, Brighton, 21, 23.
Bernard, A. B., & Durlauf, S. N. (1995). Convergence in international output. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 10(2), 97–108.
Bhattacharya, M., Inekwe, J. N., & Sadorsky, P. (2020). Consumption-based and territory-based carbon emissions intensity: Determinants and forecasting using club convergence across countries. Energy Economics, 86, 104632. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988319304293
Bibi, F., & Jamil, M. (2021). Testing environment Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in different regions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(11), 13581–13594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11516-2
Bin Salman, A. M., & Asmanto, E. (2024). Islamic Environmental Stewardship: A Sociological Approach to Hadith and Legal Frameworks for Ecological Responsibility. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 361-378.
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304407698000098
Bsoul, L., Omer, A., Kucukalic, L., & Archbold, R. H. (2022). Islam’s perspective on environmental sustainability: a conceptual analysis. Social Sciences, 11(6), 228.
Butt, M. S. (2020). State of environmental protection in the OIC countries: Genesis, ongoing initiatives and recommendations from human rights perspective. RUDN Journal of Law, 24(3), 780-800.
Camarero, M., Picazo-Tadeo, A. J., & Tamarit, C. (2013). Are the determinants of CO2 emissions converging among OECD countries? Economics Letters, 118(1), 159–162.
Caporin, M., Cooray, A., Kuziboev, B., & Yusubov, I. (2024). New insights on the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) for Central Asia. Empirical Economics, 66(5), 2335–2354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-023-02520-9
Carlino, G., & Mills, L. (1996). Convergence and The U.S. States: A Time Series Analysis*. Journal of Regional Science, 36(4), 597–616. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1996.tb01120.x
Casey, G., & Galor, O. (2016). Population Growth and Carbon Emissions (Working Paper No. 22885). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w22885
Chang, C.-P., & Lee, C.-C. (2008). Are per capita carbon dioxide emissions converging among industrialized countries? New time series evidence with structural breaks. Environment and Development Economics, 13(04). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X08004361
Churchill, S. A., Inekwe, J., & Ivanovski, K. (2020). Stochastic convergence in per capita CO2 emissions: Evidence from emerging economies, 1921–2014. Energy Economics, 86, 104659.
Criado, C. O., Valente, S., & Stengos, T. (2011). Growth and pollution convergence: Theory and evidence. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 62(2), 199–214. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069611000362
Cui, Y., Khan, S. U., Deng, Y., & Zhao, M. (2022). Spatiotemporal heterogeneity, convergence and its impact factors: Perspective of carbon emission intensity and carbon emission per capita considering carbon sink effect. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 92, 106699.
Demiral, M., Akça, E. E., & Tekin, I. (2021). Predictors of global carbon dioxide emissions: Do stringent environmental policies matter? Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(12), 18337–18361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01444-7
Dietz, T., & Rosa, E. A. (1997). Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94(1), 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.1.175
Dogah, K. E., & Churchill, S. A. (2022). Carbon emissions convergence and determinant analysis: Evidence from ASEAN countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 323, 116299.
Erdogan, S., & Okumus, I. (2021). Stochastic and club convergence of ecological footprint: An empirical analysis for different income group of countries. Ecological Indicators, 121, 107123.
Evans, D. G. R., Huson, S. M., Donnai, D., Neary, W., Blair, V., Newton, V., & Harris, R. (1992). A clinical study of type 2 neurofibromatosis. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 84(1), 603–618. https://academic.oup.com/qjmed/article-abstract/84/1/603/1561938
Gálvez-Rodríguez, J. F., Manzano-Hidalgo, M., & García-Luengo, A. V. (2025). Predicting Convergence of Per Capita Income in Spain: A Markov and Cluster Approach. Economies, 13(1), 17. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/13/1/17
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377. https://academic.oup.com/qje/article-abstract/110/2/353/1826336
Haider, S., & Akram, V. (2019). Club convergence of per capita carbon emission: Global insight from disaggregated level data. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 11074–11086.
Huang, Y., Kuldasheva, Z., & Salahodjaev, R. (2021). Renewable energy and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from major energy-consuming countries. Energies, 14(22), 7504.
Islam, N. (2003). What have we learnt from the convergence debate? Journal of Economic Surveys, 17(3), 309–362.
Ivanovski, K., & Churchill, S. A. (2020). Convergence and determinants of greenhouse gas emissions in Australia: A regional analysis. Energy Economics, 92, 104971. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014098832030311X
Iwata, H., & Okada, K. (2014). Greenhouse gas emissions and the role of the Kyoto Protocol. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 16(4), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-012-0047-1
Koehrsen, J. (2021). Muslims and climate change: How Islam, Muslim organizations, and religious leaders influence climate change perceptions and mitigation activities. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 12(3), e702.
Kula, E. (2001). Islam and environmental conservation. Environmental Conservation, 28(1), 1-9.
Li, C., Zuo, J., Wang, Z., & Zhang, X. (2020). Production-and consumption-based convergence analyses of global CO2 emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, 121723. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652620317704
Mikael, A. M., & Heshmati, A. (2022). Convergence of carbon dioxide emissions in the Americas and its determinants. Latin American Economic Review, 31, 1–33. https://latinaer.org/index.php/laer/article/view/49
Onofrei, M., Vatamanu, A. F., & Cigu, E. (2022). The relationship between economic growth and CO2 emissions in EU countries: A cointegration analysis. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 934885. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.934885/full
Panopoulou, E., & Pantelidis, T. (2009). Club convergence in carbon dioxide emissions. Environmental and Resource Economics, 44, 47–70.
Payne, J. E., & Apergis, N. (2021). Convergence of per capita carbon dioxide emissions among developing countries: Evidence from stochastic and club convergence tests. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 33751– 33763.
Pesaran, M. H. (2012). On the interpretation of panel unit root tests. Economics Letters, 116(3), 545–546. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176512001905
Phillips, P. C., & Sul, D. (2007). Transition modeling and econometric convergence tests. Econometrica, 75(6), 1771–1855. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00811.x
Robério de Souza Sá, Á., & da Silva Gomes, L. (2025). Convergence and Determinants of Carbon Emissions in Brazilian Agriculture. Revista Portuguesa de Estudos Regionais (RPER), 70.
Rodríguez-Benavides, D., Andrés-Rosales, R., Álvarez-García, J., & Bekun, F. V. (2024). Convergence of clubs between per capita carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels and cement production. Energy Policy, 186, 114007. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524000272
Román-Collado, R., & Morales-Carrión, A. V. (2018). Towards a sustainable growth in Latin America: A multiregional spatial decomposition analysis of the driving forces behind CO2 emissions changes. Energy Policy, 115, 273–280. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421518300193
Romero-Ávila, D. (2008). Convergence in carbon dioxide emissions among industrialised countries revisited. Energy Economics, 30(5), 2265–2282.
Runar, B., Amin, K., & Patrik, S. (2017). Convergence in carbon dioxide emissions and the role of growth and institutions: A parametric and non-parametric analysis. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 19(2), 359–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-016-0162-5
Sadorsky, P. (2009). Renewable energy consumption and income in emerging economies. Energy Policy, 37(10), 4021–4028. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421509003176
Sala-i-Martin, X. X. (1996). The classical approach to convergence analysis. The Economic Journal, 106(437), 1019–1036.
Solarin, S. A. (2014). Convergence of CO2 emission levels: Evidence from African countries. Journal of Economic Research, 19(1), 65–92.
Solarin, S. A. (2019). Convergence in CO2 emissions, carbon footprint and ecological footprint: Evidence from OECD countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 6167–6181.
Strazicich, M. C., & List, J. A. (2003). [No title found]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 24(3), 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022910701857
Tiwari, A. K., Kyophilavong, P., & Albulescu, C. T. (2016). Testing the stationarity of CO2 emissions series in Sub-Saharan African countries by incorporating nonlinearity and smooth breaks. Research in International Business and Finance, 37, 527-540.
Wang, Q., Zhang, F., Li, R., & Sun, J. (2024). Does artificial intelligence promote energy transition and curb carbon emissions? The role of trade openness. Journal of Cleaner Production, 447, 141298. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624007455
Wang, X., Wang, Y., & Zhou, K. (2024). The impact of energy poverty alleviation on carbon emissions in countries along the Belt and Road initiative. Sustainability, 16(11), 4681. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4681
Wollburg, P., Hallegatte, S., & Mahler, D. G. (2023). Ending extreme poverty has a negligible impact on global greenhouse gas emissions. Nature, 623(7989), 982–986. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06679-0
Yang, Z., Yuan, Y., & Tan, Y. (2022). Club Convergence of Economies’ Per Capita Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Countries That Proposed Carbon Neutrality. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14), 8336.
Zivot, E., and Andrews, D.W.K. (1992) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol.10, No.3, pp.251-70
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
MBER have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, MBER recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
MBER is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
You are free to:
- Share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.