Abstract
Corruption remains pervasive in many Islamic countries, despite the ethical values and integrity often associated with religious norms. This study investigates the state religion's impact on corruption levels in member countries of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). Utilizing cross-sectional data from 53 OIC countries and employing the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression method, the study finds that the percentage of the Muslim population has a negative but statistically weak effect on the Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI). Conversely, the adoption of Islam as a state religion significantly increases corruption, suggesting that religious institutionalization may undermine governance quality. These results challenge prior assumptions that religiosity inherently reduces corruption. Instead, the study highlights that institutional framework, rather than religious adherence, shape governance outcomes. The findings underscore the need for anti-corruption efforts in Islamic countries to prioritize institutional reforms and economic policies that enhance transparency and accountability, rather than relying solely on religious values. Keywords: Corruption, Islam, State Religion, OICAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
MBER have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, MBER recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
MBER is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
You are free to:
- Share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.