Abstract
The escalation of the Israel-Palestine conflict has garnered global attention. Public condemnation through mass boycotts of pro-Israel products has significantly impacted capital markets, particularly the sharia stock market in countries with Muslim majority populations. The volatility of sharia stock returns becomes a crucial focal point in this context as it serves as a sensitive indicator of geopolitical events and changes in investor sentiment. This study investigates the connection between the volatility of sharia stock returns in Indonesia and investor sentiment as a result of the Israel-Palestine conflict. Researchers use the GARCH (1,1) model to look at how investor sentiment and the conflict between Israel and Palestine affect the volatility of Sharia stock returns indexed by the Jakarta Islamic Index (JII), using monthly data from January 2012 to February 2024. The researchers hypothesized that investor sentiment and the Israeli-Palestine conflict affect Islamic stock returns in Indonesia, but the results of this study show that the two factors have no effect on Islamic stock returns. The findings of this research provide valuable insights for financial market practitioners, investors, and regulators in understanding the impact of geopolitical conflicts on the capital market, particularly in the context of sharia stocks in Indonesia. By considering investor sentiment factors and market fluctuations triggered by such geopolitical events, this study provides a stronger foundation for wise investment decision-making and effective risk management, thereby enhancing the stability and performance of sharia capital markets in the future.Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
MBER have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, MBER recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
MBER is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
You are free to:
- Share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.