Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the number of overviews on the commonalities of socially responsible investment (SRI) with Islamic finance by providing critical thinking in terms of the investment screening process. The main critical reviews are obtained from the articles, paperwork, and previous related studies from reputable open access journals such as Emerald, SSRN databases, and other indexed-Scopus on the Web of Science. This study finds that the commonalities of socially responsible investment with Islamic finance has seemingly been characterized as a slow-moving but unstoppable works since global movements aspire to prevent a transgression of Earth's boundaries towards financial risks. Intertemporal choice accounts for how reliable constitutes for transitioning and adapting planetary boundaries in investment decisions. The challenge is to bridge the postulated gap on the commonalities of SRI with Islamic finance leading into social and financial return aspects in order to construct long-term predictions and scenarios embodying the Islamic finance concept through environmental, social and governance (ESG) approach.Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
MBER have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, MBER recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
MBER is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
You are free to:
- Share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.