AbstractIn recent decades, the validity and the sufficiency of the term ‘religion' as an analytical category have been examined by many religious studies scholars. This essay urges Muslim scholars, sociologists, and scholars of religion to be cautious and to direct critical attention to the practice of categorizing the term ‘religion' in their scholarly discourse and in society at large. Such critical deliberations on the use of ‘religion' as an analytical category must occupy a focal position within any meaningful academic discourse pertaining to religious phenomenon in general and Islam in particular. To be more specific, the critical analysis of the term ‘religion,' and of its delineations with seemingly secular categories, must be further constructively incorporated into any academic discourse on religious phenomena or Islamic tradition. Each distinct conception of the term ‘religion,’ as well as its differentiation from other analytical categories, are outcomes of a particular historical occurrence, within the bounds of specific social institutions and interactions, framed by particular traditions and norms. This essay's critical analysis encompasses not only the category of ‘religion' in various geographical and historical settings, but also the conception of ‘religion' in anthropological and sociological literature.
Asad, T., 1983. Anthropological Conceptions of Religion: Reflections on Geertz. The journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 18(2), pp.237-259.
Asad, T., 1993. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam, 2, pp.27-54.
Carus, P., 1904. Definition of Religion. The Monist, (5), pp.766-770.
Drake, E., 1927. The Definition of Religion: A Symposium. The journal of Religion, (2), pp.113-135.
Emmons, R., 2003. The Psychology of Religion. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), pp.377-402.
Ferré, F., 1970. The Definition of Religion. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 38(1), pp.3-16.
Fitzgerald, T. & ProQuest, 2011. Religion and Politics in International Relations: The Modern Myth, New York: Continuum.
Fitzgerald, T., 2007. Discourse on Civility and Barbarity: A Critical History of Religion and Related Categories, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goody, J., 1961. Religion and Ritual: The Definitional Problem. The British Journal of Sociology, 12(2), pp.142-164.
Hallaq, W.B., 2005. Authority, Continuity, and Change in Islamic Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hallaq, W.B., 2013. The Impossible State: Islam, Politics, and Modernity's Moral POredicament, New York: Columbia University Press.
Hallaq, W.B., 2018. Restating Orientalism: A Critique of Modern Knowledge, New York: Columbia University Press.
Herbrechtsmeier, W., 1993. Buddhism and the Definition of Religion: One More Time. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 32(1), pp.1-18.
Hewitt, J., 1902. Orenda and a Definition of Religion. American Anthropologist, 4(1), pp.33-46.
Hjärpe, J., 2015. Essentialism or an Anthropological Approach: The Role and Function of the Scientific Study of Religion in a Historical Perspective. Numen, 62(2-3), pp.301-320.
Kishimoto, H., 1961. An Operational Definition of Religion. Numen, 8(3), pp.236-240.
Long, T., 1980. Religion and the Construction of Social Problems. Sociological Analysis, 41(2), pp.95-183.
Luke, A., 1995. Text and Discourse in Education: An introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis. Review of Research in Education, 21(1), pp.3-48.
Lukes, S., 2012. Is Durkheim's Understanding of Religion Compatible with Believing? Religion, 42(1), pp.41-52.
Mayotte, J., 1998. Religion and Global Affairs: The Role of Religion in Development. SAIS Review, 18(2), pp.65-69.
McCutcheon, R., 1999. The Insider/Outsider Problem in the Study of Religion: A Reader. A&C Black.
Nongbri, B., 2013. Before Religion. Yale University Press.
Narayanan, V., 2015. The History of the Academic Study of Religion in Universities, Centers, and Institutes in India. Numen, 62(1), pp.7-39.
Norman, A., 2011. Contemporary Western Ethnography and the Definition of Religion - by M. D. Stringer. The Journal of Religious History, 35(1), pp.133-134.
Orru, M., 1992. Durkheim, Religion, and Buddhism. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 31(1), pp.47-61.
Saucier, G., 2006. Spiritual But Not Religious? Evidence for Two Independent Dispositions. Journal of Personality., 74(5), pp.1257-1292.
Shilling, C., 1998. Durkheim, Morality and Modernity: Collective Effervescence, Homo Duplex and the Sources of Moral Action. The British Journal of Sociology, 49(2), pp.193-209.
Smith, W.C., 1962. The Meaning and End of Religion: A New Approach to the Religious Traditions of Mankind, Macmillan.
Stark, R., 1983. Beyond Durkheim: Religion and Suicide. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 22(2), pp.120-131.
Wells, W., 1921. Is Supernaturalistic Belief Essential in a Definition of Religion? The Journal of Philosophy, 18(10), pp.269-275.
Zinnbauer, B., 1999. The Emerging Meanings of Religiousness and Spirituality: Problems and Prospects. Journal of Personality, 67(6), pp.889-919
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.